× PoliticsRoyaltySoap OperaGamingMoneyPrivacy PolicyTerms And Conditions
Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Unions see red as Starmer slams door on extra cash for teacher and NHS pay hikes



Jesus. It's like watching a car crash in slow motion. The honeymoon period for Labour lasted what - three months? Four? Now we're back to the same old union battles that made the 70s such a joy for everyone involved.

Strike threats are hanging over us like storm clouds after Downing Street basically told teachers and NHS workers they can forget about proper funding for their pay rises. I spent Tuesday morning talking to a friend who teaches at a comprehensive in Leeds, and her exact words were: "We're all just waiting for the other shoe to drop." Poor woman hasn't had a real-terms pay increase since 2010.

Hear this Article

The numbers game nobody wants to play

Here's where it gets messy. Pay review bodies (those supposedly independent groups that recommend salary increases) are pushing for around 4% for teachers and 3% for NHS staff. But - and this is the kicker - budgets only account for 2.8%.

So who pays for the difference? According to Number 10, that money needs to come from existing department budgets. Which is government-speak for "figure it out yourselves."



Unions are, predictably, furious.

When promises meet reality

Daniel Kebede, who heads up the National Education Union, didn't mince his words. "It's really important that we do have a pay award that takes steps to address that crisis in recruitment and retention but equally, we need to see the pay award funded."

Translation: Don't make schools choose between paying teachers properly or buying textbooks.

He also reminded the government about their election promises: "They were elected on the promise of change, of recruiting six and a half thousand new teachers. We hope they stick to those promises."

That last bit felt like a warning shot across the bow if I've ever heard one.

Rachel's impossible math problem

I almost feel sorry for Rachel Reeves. Almost. The Chancellor is stuck between teh rock of public sector demands and the hard place of economic reality. With Trump threatening trade wars and the economy still wobbling like a newborn foal, she's facing pressure to either hike taxes or slash spending in the upcoming Budget.

Neither option wins friends.

Been there, struck that

The Royal College of Nursing's Jo Galbraith-Marten echoed what everyone in healthcare is thinking - any pay rise needs proper funding or it's just robbing Peter to pay Paul. Her exact words: taking resources away from front-line services is "unfair on staff and bad for patients."

Last year, ministers caved and accepted recommendations between 4.75% and 6% to end the disputes that had ambulances parked and operations canceled. I remember interviewing a paramedic in Manchester who'd lost £3,200 in wages from striking but said he'd do it again in a heartbeat.

Will we see a repeat? Nobody's saying the S-word yet, but it's hanging in the air.

The Tories couldn't resist...

Andrew Griffith, now Shadow Business Secretary, jumped in with both feet: "People forgot what the 1970s were like, but Labour is giving us all a refresher course – bins rotting in the streets, waves of strikes and unions holding the country to ransom."

Rich coming from the party that presided over the most days lost to strikes since the 80s, but whatever. Politics gonna politic.

Starmer tried playing peacemaker yesterday, saying the "last thing" NHS staff wanted was more disputes. "If you work with the NHS staff, you get better results than the last government, which just went into battle with them," he said.

"So we have got our doctors and nurses on the front line, not the picket line, and I think everybody appreciates that's a much better way of doing business."

Nice words. Let's see if they translate to actual funding.

Back in 2016 I covered the junior doctors' strikes. The placards and chants change, but the fundamental issues never seem to. And now we're watching the same movie with different actors.

Hold onto your hats, folks. Autumn could get bumpy.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is the function of the executive branch?

The executive branch is responsible for implementing and enforcing laws, managing the day-to-day operations of government, and administering public policy. It is headed by the president or prime minister, depending on the country's system.


What is the importance of political participation?

Political participation is vital for a healthy democracy, as it allows citizens to express their opinions, influence decision-making, and hold elected officials accountable. Engaged citizens contribute to the legitimacy of the political system.


What are the implications of gerrymandering?

Gerrymandering involves manipulating electoral district boundaries to favor a particular political party or group. This practice can undermine the democratic process by diluting the voting power of certain populations and skewing representation.


Statistics

  • Approximately 60% of eligible voters in the United States participated in the 2020 presidential election, marking the highest turnout rate in over a century.
  • Historically, voter turnout among young people (ages 18-29) increased by 50% from the previous election cycle in the 2020 presidential election.
  • Research indicates that around 80% of individuals in democracies feel that their government does not adequately represent their interests.
  • Polling data indicates that over 50% of Americans support the idea of ranked-choice voting as a method to improve electoral fairness.
  • In 2022, over 30 countries experienced significant protests related to political issues, highlighting a global trend of civil unrest and demands for accountability.
  • As of 2023, public trust in government institutions has declined, with only 20% of citizens expressing confidence in their national governments.
  • Approximately 90% of political campaigns in the U.S. utilize social media as a primary tool for outreach and engagement with voters.
  • Data reveals that around 40% of the global population lives under some form of authoritarian regime, affecting their political freedoms.

External Links

usa.gov

cnn.com

pewresearch.org

opensecrets.org

politicalwire.com

nytimes.com

economist.com

huffpost.com

How To

How To Get Involved in Political Campaigns

Getting involved in political campaigns is a rewarding way to influence the democratic process. Start by identifying a candidate or cause that aligns with your values. Volunteer for the campaign by offering your skills in areas such as canvassing, phone banking, or event organization. Attend campaign meetings to learn about strategies and goals. Engaging with your community through organized events can help mobilize support. Additionally, consider contributing financially if feasible, as campaign resources are crucial for outreach efforts.